Essay About Survival Of The Fittest Example For Students

Essay About Survival Of The Fittest Charles Darwin felt strongly that observations made on large scale explorationssuch as his voyage on the Beagle showed conclusively that many clearly differentorganisms, animals as well as plants, were related to one another buy someunknown law. In other words Darwin was trying to prove that evolution existed.However Darwin does outline how a purely natural process of selection couldproduce similar effects, and thus explain the development of new species withoutreference to supernatural intervention. Taking that into consideration, Ibelieve that by Natural Selection Darwin is trying to portray thestruggle for existence and adaptation for survival among living things. WithNatural Selection, Darwin used this term to explain the casual mechanism, whichis responsible for the operation of his theory. He would go about and abandonhis term in favor of the term Survival of the Fittest. Although he receivedcriticism from so many of his peers for using Natural Selection, the term isquite important because virtually all biologists used it as the explanation forthe mechanism. A main reason why Natural Selection was not very popular wasbecause evolution requires enormously long periods of time, that the everydayexperience of human beings provides them with no ability to interpret suchhistories. Looking at Darwins position, Survival of the Fittest had a greatmeaning on the struggle for existence and Darwins emphasis on abundance. Firstlooking at Survival of the fittest, its a phrase that describes the outcome ofa competition where there is no possibility of predicting the outcome in advancebecause of the complexity of the conditions of the competition. It describesonly the effect or outcome of an event by its very nature and regardless of thesituation in which it is used. For example, if it were used to describe theoutcome of an auto race such as the Nascar, using the term, It will be survivalof the fittest would indicate that the victor would be unknown until theend of the race. Similarly, if discussing the survival of a business in acollapsing economy or perhaps the survival of a race of people during fiercewars would indicate that nothing would be known about the outcome until the endof the particular event. Secondly Survival of the Fittest was used extensivelybecause it was a better, more descriptive, explanation of the mechanism of whichevolution occurred. The term contains an implicit assumption that survivors arean improved form of organism compared to those, which do not survive. Althoughintelligence is a key to improvements it is not however true for the field ofbiological reproduction. There is no human intelligence available to weed outthe defectives and alter the process toward a more desirable end. As moreindividuals are produced that can possibly survive, there must in every case bea struggle for existence, either one individual with another of the samespecies, or with the individuals of distinct species, or with physicalconditions of life. Keeping that in mind, I came upon one of the greatestmysteries of biological history, the vanishing of the dinosaurs. Here Survivalof the Fittest plays a routine role because the fittest were some form ofbacteria. Does that mean that the smaller the organism the more chances of it tosurvive? A look at the fossil record shows that 99. 99% of the survivors weresimpler organisms and the survivors that we know of today are not the 0.01% ofsurvivors that are more fit from a complexity standpoint and thus prove themethodology of the theory. So what does the term fittest mean? It is speculatedthat the term fittest refers to an organism which has the bestcapability for acquiring and using all the available nutrients, all whiledeveloping or having a capability of fending off physical threats to itsexistence. However this concept would indeed be an explanation for a certaintype of organism. .u1656a888b25a51496e82b195138ed4bb , .u1656a888b25a51496e82b195138ed4bb .postImageUrl , .u1656a888b25a51496e82b195138ed4bb .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u1656a888b25a51496e82b195138ed4bb , .u1656a888b25a51496e82b195138ed4bb:hover , .u1656a888b25a51496e82b195138ed4bb:visited , .u1656a888b25a51496e82b195138ed4bb:active { border:0!important; } .u1656a888b25a51496e82b195138ed4bb .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u1656a888b25a51496e82b195138ed4bb { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u1656a888b25a51496e82b195138ed4bb:active , .u1656a888b25a51496e82b195138ed4bb:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u1656a888b25a51496e82b195138ed4bb .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u1656a888b25a51496e82b195138ed4bb .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u1656a888b25a51496e82b195138ed4bb .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u1656a888b25a51496e82b195138ed4bb .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u1656a888b25a51496e82b195138ed4bb:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u1656a888b25a51496e82b195138ed4bb .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u1656a888b25a51496e82b195138ed4bb .u1656a888b25a51496e82b195138ed4bb-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u1656a888b25a51496e82b195138ed4bb:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: The Last Seven Months of Anne Frank- Willy Lindwer Essay For example, there are many coral deposits throughout theworld, some which are immense in size such as the body coral, which is currentlyin Florida. Unfortunately marine coral is really not an organism, but rather acollection of organisms. Since there are really no such organisms in existenceas described above, it must be concluded that this is not what thefittest is, in the sense of Darwins meaning. The termfittest as contained in Survival of the Fittest can only beconstrued as the organism fitter than other members of organisms falling into aspecial group. This is consistent with the descriptions used by Darwin and alsoused by most evolutionists in the explanation offered for the mechanism ofevolution. A quick look in the animal kingdom shows the rapidly reproducingFruit Fly, with a serious deficiency that being the inability to penetrate theskin of even the thinnest of fruit, and thus release the sugars which begin theprocess which produces their food. These mechanisms are available in thousandsof organisms, both in the animal and vegetable kingdoms. Many mechanisms such asin the mosquito, stingers, bee/wasp, or a dissolving fluid such as produced byother insects abound in nature. It is inexplicable in the Darwinian sense, thatsome advice or method of doing this would fail to be developed over the pasteons of their existence. It must be concluded that while they are survivors,they are not the fittest. This leads to the fact that Darwins theory has notexplained the existing spectrum of living organisms either in the initialdevelopment from the mineral state or in the highly developed state in which itexists today. In conclusion, Darwin stresses that nothing is easier than toadmit in words the truth of the universal struggle for life. Darwin also pointsthat in looking at Nature, it is most necessary to never forget that everysingle organic being around us may be said to be striving to the utmost increasein numbers. He says that each lives by a struggle at some period of its life:that heavy destruction inevitably falls either on young or old, during eachgeneration or at a recurrent intervals. We behold the fact of nature bright withgladness, we often see superabundance of food, and that the birds which are idlysinging round us mostly live on insects or seeds and thus constantly destroyinglife. Darwin makes it clear that the structure of every organic being isrelated, in the most essential yet often hidden manner, to that of all otherorganic beings, with which it comes into competition for food or residence andfrom which it has to escape, or on which it preys. This is obvious in thestructure of the teeth and talons of the tiger, and in that of the legs andclaws of the parasite, which clings to the hair on the tigers body. Afterlooking at all the examples it turns out that this is an unabated belief systemwhich underlies the study of all the physical sciences. The most important ofthese beliefs is that all phenomena in the universe are capable of beingmeasured or acknowledged, by one of the five senses of man. It ought to be notedthat to evolutionists, there is no objection to philosophy being a part ofscience and the fact that it is absolutely unthinkable to them that religion bea part of it only shows a bias of the same sort that keeps Darwins theoryalive. But we must not forget that neither philosophy nor religion is a properconsideration of the physical sciences and the theory of Charles Darwin. At lastI must say this was a fascinating project and for years to come Darwins theorywill explore many questions of nature and survival that are not yet cleared andwill solve many mysteries that we have not solved.